A young Argentine teacher tweeted what it seems to me a very revealing short phrase. I read it in passing and I was instantly interested in it.
“I dream of an education that teaches kids to think and produce … and not just to reproduce.”
Although I chose to comment within the Argentine cultural context, I am sure many will find this applicable to other cultures. I barely know the person that wrote that phrase but I can assure you she wrote with the best intentions.
I detect a wordplay in the use of “produce” and “reproduce” meaning on one hand the ability to duplicate or repeat what the child was taught and on the other hand, the economic sense of “production” and the sexual sense of “reproduction” — Mind the fact that perhaps the wordplay was not intentional and I may be adding meaning to the ambiguity of the phrase. If that is the case, I am at fault and not the author. I cannot tell if there are subconscious impulses at play. I do not claim to read minds.
For my commentary, I will take the meaning that most worried Argentines will read because the country currently suffers from terminal non-productivity and the poorest Argentines are the less educated and the ones reproducing the fastest, and quickly growing in number in this society rapidly approaching social anarchy.
Being Catholic, I think of the family as the first church and the first school a child will know. Most of the men and women that set the foundations of our civilization had very little of what we know now as schooling. To give one local example: Jorge Luis Borges, arguably the most influential Argentine writer of the 20th century, was home schooled by his grandmother, attending a Swiss Gymnasium briefly from 1914 to 1919. In contrast, some of the best schooled individuals in this country — including our current President — have been responsible for colossal errors of judgment in spite of their superior education.
Teaching children to think and produce is a tall order. There are precocious talents like W. A. Mozart and late bloomers like Albert Einstein or Thomas Aquinas. Some may remember that Aquinas was considered dumb at first. No one could possibly notice that the slow-learning Thomas was developing an extraordinary ability to comprehend and catalogue nearly any kind of phenomena in his unique mind.
For the globalist mentality it is imperative to get a youngster into production mode as quickly as possible, to extract the most profit during the young years. That is a desirable thing when taken in the proper context but we must remember that the drive for maximum corporate efficiency has generated some bad output: older adults become unemployable after a certain age, and societies begin to see some ‘unproductive individuals’ as a burden. That mentality is a contributing factor to the push for euthanasia, abortion, and the promotion of sterile lifestyles.
Ideally, human reproduction should be ordered to reason. Our problem since the days of Adam and Eve is that concupiscence gets in the way. Different cultures learned to deal with that problem in different ways. We owe to the ancient Hebrews a series of rules that tried to keep the problem under control for many centuries. Human sexual impulse is a very dangerous weapon that human beings carry around loaded almost all the time. The force of Eros is such that we can affirm that the beginning of all laws is the human attempt to keep the useful part of it while trying to control Pan, the wild destructive part of the same force.
But reproduce we must. It is the first commandment that mankind received: “God blessed them, and God said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it …” From that simple commandment we understand that sterile sexuality thwarts the will of God. Eros was always understood to be a life giving force even for pagans. A pro-life Catholic not only rejects abortion but also any kind of practice that separates marital pleasure from its life-giving purpose. That includes same-sex relations and all kinds of contraception. I do not have the time and space to develop this theme but there is a very good book written on this subject: The Bible and Birth Control by Charles D. Provan. (Psalm 127: 4)
Some may believe the author of the phrase was simply talking about the mission of educators: that children must be taught the ways of creativity and not merely to reproduce what others have previously thought. That is a lofty ideal. Many years ago I took to read the history of the Roman Empire in much detail. I observed that, as the Roman civilization declined, so did the originality of their thinkers. That process of merely repeating and enumerating the achievements of previous generations continued and accentuated the decline of the Empire, perhaps even accelerated it.
I do believe that we have to build upon what previous generations have left for us. Let us not forget that great creative masters like Picasso and Dalí where studious copiers of Goya, Rembrandt, Sanzio, and DaVinci before they decided to explore their own paths of creativity. There is a great phrase that is attributed to Picasso: “The small artist copies but the great artist steals!” meaning that one has to grasp the spirit of the preceding masters and dare to be like them not only in their style but also in the very sources of their artistry. Thus the artist develops the ability to transcend the received model and moves on to create meaningful new ideas without abandoning tradition but giving it a new voice.
To instill in children that kind of fire is —most unfortunately— a gift that only a few teachers have. In a sense, it has a lot to do with the kind of reproduction that makes sons and daughters of every disciple. If anyone could synthesize the methods of those like Nadia Boulanger, Maria Montessori, or the great masters of Christianity in such a way that any ordinary teacher could learn to teach like them, well … that would be wonderful indeed.
Teaching the soul
“Those who are nonspiritual do not receive the gifts of God’s Spirit, for such gifts are foolishness to them, and they are unable to understand them because the gifts of God’s spirit are discerned spiritually.” (1 Corinthians 2:14)
One more time we revisit T. S. Eliot’s most prophetic paragraph:
“The World is trying the experiment of attempting to form a civilized but non-Christian mentality. The experiment will fail; but we must be very patient in awaiting its collapse; meanwhile redeeming the time: so that the Faith may be preserved alive through the dark ages before us; to renew and rebuild civilization, and save the World from suicide.” – T. S. Eliot, Thoughts After Lambeth, 1931.
When applied to the education of children, this insightful thought is truly frightening because the failure of the education experiment means the failure to launch a soul on to the realization of its own destiny. Christ said very clearly: “Without me you can accomplish nothing!” (John 15:5) Thus we must conclude that achieving the knowledge of Christ and a measure of intellectual intimacy with Him, are essential to develop a human being to the fullest.
I think this is the form of education our young teacher rightly dreams of. The kind of learning able to conform the mind to the Logos, giving children the impulse to produce on their own, not merely teaching to reproduce results but adding their own contributions to a society that is truly Catholic.
We must add — even running the risk of being unpopular — that the only kind of society that can survive over time and thrive is a Catholic society and thus we must educate with that in mind. The current experiment is failing. Many of us are aware that we are living in the dark age that Eliot predicted. The good news is: these dark ages won’t last forever and the dream of our young teacher will be realized. Reconstruction is around the corner.
“the poorest Argentines are the less educated and the ones reproducing the fastest”
Interesting because it is the opposite in Québec. In Québec the poorest people have less children.
The mindset is different I guess. In Québec and in Canada, the society is so materialistic than the poor will not have children unless they have enough money to give them all of the new gadgets and everything other children have.
To remedy that, the Canadian government has opened the door to a great number of immigrants because these immigrants will have children no matter what. They are less materialistic than French-Canadians I guess.
I know that Latin Americans and Africans who are now in Canada do not necessarily wait to be rich enough to have children.
Here in Canada, the government is very happy to see immigrants have many children because the native poors in the same conditions of poverty than the immigrants would refuse to reproduce.
Canada need people in low-pay jobs and Canada will find the future workers this way.
The government is maybe happy with that but I am not sure it is a good sign for the country.
Keeping my Rosary close.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“For the globalist mentality it is imperative to get a youngster into production mode as quickly as possible, to extract the most profit during the young years.”
And it is more and more so if you compare to 25 or 50 years ago, at least here in Canada.
So much so that it is remarkable how, for example, we do not have great poets anymore, in Canada and in other Western countries also.
And look at the music of today compared to the pop and rock songs of the 1960’s, the 1970’s and the 1980’s. It seems that there are no more beatles, no more Elton John, no more Cliff Richard in Britain and no more Charles Trenet, Gilbert Bécaud or Charles Aznavour in France.
The globalist mentality seems to bring with it a kind of decadence of the arts, especially poetry and music.
The youth of today have been in daycare centers from age 1 to 5 and when they arrive at school all is organized in a way that they do not have one minute to stop and think a little.
No wonder there are no more great poets as we used to have in previous décades.
We are living in dark days. We have to pray the Rosary with much fervor.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You reminded me of a song I heard for the first time when I was 10 years old and I was learning my first words of French. I think after hearing that song no one could find any romance in Communism. Gilbert Bécaud will always remain in my mind through this song: Nathalie. I hope Nathalie got to know Paris and drink chocolat at a street-side café.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a beautiful song “Nathalie” by Gilbert Bécaud. At the time, because of this song, he was one of the rare Western singers known and appreciated in the Soviet Union.
We have to say that there always have been a kind of friendship between the French and the Russians (except for the time when Napoleon tried to invade Russia).
Sadly, no more great artist like Gilbert Bécaud in France. If you have a chance, listen to this other title from Gilbert Bécaud:
“So far away from Courbevoie”
I like very much that song too.
Keeping my Rosary close.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I found it. I had to post the song. Just too cute;
Gilbert Bécaud – “So far away from Courbevoie”
LikeLiked by 2 people
All my readers are very dear to me. I pray for you all and attend Mass daily for you. From time to time, someone comes here with gratuitous adversarial comments that lack arguments or the necessary information to make them relevant. So, I am going to post this comment to make a few things clear.
1. It is OK to disagree with me but it is not OK to state your opinion without argument. For example “I do not believe in Fatima.” We have been informed of your opinion but this blog does not exist so you can be a contrarian and state your opinions as if they were divine. If you don’t believe in X and do not bother to back your opinion with a sensible argument… you know where to go.
2. Signing “Bishop Jack” does not make you a bishop (or a priest, or anything) So, if you are going to sign with a religious title, please make sure to provide your full identity. Otherwise your comment will be deleted because I do not know if you are stealing someone’s identity.
3. This blog is not a democracy. This is an autocratic realm and I am self invested with totalitarian powers. If you don’t like it, get your own blog. There you can bark all day at leisure. If you come here looking for trouble, your comments will never be published, and if you insist, I will add you to the spam list where you belong.
Keep it clean, positive, logical and charitable. I haven’t called fire from Heaven upon anyone yet but one never knows! 😀
Don’t make me put you in “the list” — you don’t want to be there, I assure you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think that no education is far preferable to a bad one, no matter how many levels of it one has. Indeed, with third and fourth level nowadays, it is likely that one has become even more excessively diseducated.
A person with no education still has the Natural Law written on his heart and possesses his common sense. One finds this with many simple people. Bad education simply obliterates all this and replaces it with wrong principles and insane ideologies. The world is going mad all round about us, but the driving force is coming from those who claim to know more than anyone before them.
[Michel: you should check out your late fellow Canadian, Leonard Cohen. Undoubtedly a poet, and he wrote a song ‘The Future’ nearly thirty years ago which now seems like prophesy, in which he describes ‘the breaking of the ancient Western code’].
LikeLiked by 1 person
Comments are closed.